Firstly thank you for reading/responding.

15yr+ Enterprise developer here.

I have an idea for a product offering (and a POC almost done) that i think Alchemy/Infura might be missing, but i am totally ready to have my bubble popped here. There might be a great reason no one has done this before, so im ready to hear that.

Just incase there is not a good reason: i think that I might see an issue with Alchemy’s pub/sub that makes it kindof sub-par for a few important use-cases on the blockchain - especially when enterprise adoption is concerned. Here are my concerns:

  • eth_subscribe is not fault-tolerant - in that there is no stateful buffer for your event. It’s fire-and-forget over the websocket and if you’re not there, you miss it.
  • eth-newfilter + eth_getFilterChanges seems like a rad solution, but it has never worked for me thru alchemy. After about 30seconds the event filter deletes itself regardless of how often i call eth_getFilterChanges.

Either way - this seems to slightly miss the point of wanting a reliable queue as it relies on polling (likely 2 levels of polling - once internally by alchemy to gather logs between block-spans, and once from the “subscriber” to pull the logs over the wire)

I feel like there may be a product offering hidden in my learnings of using these systems at scale.

For example: I cant see a great way (and i might just be wrong, so please point me to solutions if you know of them) to use these Alchemy pub-sub systems to efficiently do these things at scale:

  1. Give me all board-ape transfers since bored-apes were created, then keep watching forever.
  2. Give me all transfers to the 0x00 address for contract X between block Y and Z.
  3. Give me all the addresses which have EVER owned a bored ape regardless of current balance.

Im not promoting because its still just an idea, but I have a POC of a website that a subscriber could integrate with using like 5 lines of JS code. You could subscribe with at-least-once delivery of blockchain topic filters.

For those curious: the stack is NextJS+cognito+K8s+pg+rabbitMq

But having rabbitMq means that if your app goes down you will still get your events with a guarantee. It also means that :

  • you (the subscriber) can parallelize the HECK out of processing of these logs.
  • we (the service gathering the logs) can also parallelize the query/aggregation of the events.
  • we (the service gathering the logs) can pull events from “latest” blocks while watching for you and re-queue them if they are involved in an re-org. That means you can safely operate closer to the head of the blockchain and possibly get events sooner than other systems could safely allow.

The question i have for this sub is…Is this a complete waste of time, or would someone find value in this?

  • Algorhythmicall@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    I think there likely is some value here. I ended up building around this issue in house. I do things a bit different… actually poll full logs for block ranges (dynamically based on chain) and track last successful blocks etc. I focus on at least once delivery with idempotent event handling. Partitioning of filters is based on consistent hashes. Offsets are stored for each chain and partition in Postgres. If what you had existed with infura, I wouldn’t have built it. Kafka style consumer groups would be ideal.

  • Ok-Two3581@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    Absolutely! Currently I was using eventeum which works but is unmaintained . A reliable event listener that hooks into rabbit mq or Kafka is desperately needed.

    If you’re an enterprise dev, eventeum is java based and has a rabbitmq integration so it might be a good project to base yours off if Java is your bag.

    • whatsmyline@alien.topOPBEnglish
      1·
      10 months ago

      Thank you for the input. The response here has been very encouraging. The application i created is actually not written in Java, but mostly in typescript for nextjs app and go for k8s worker pods. The server-side worker components are built to be extremely efficient to cut down on compute costs.

      If people are interested, I could record a demo of my proof of concept, which could highlight the functionality and ease of integration. It’s still rather ugly of ux, but it’s functionality is there. I had imagined that if anyone wanted to integrate with this system, they would likely have their own user experiences into which they want to expose this functionality.

      I have built a REST api, a typescript SDK, and a CLI.

      The system itself has a basic ui, auth, compute tagging with stripe billing all mostly complete. It starts and stops workers to save compute based on who’s subscribed. The largest cost of this system is the EKS and ec2 costs and the price of the rabbitMQ. Both of which would be very healthy for shared enterprise use with ~$200/Month in overhead costs. The eks jobs are tagged with the user who started the job… we could theoretically charge consumers of the watchers directly for their compute costs at a very modest fee to offset that overhead. Perhaps free tiers for startups/hobby, then $5-10/ watcher/month for anything with significant load.

  • Treo123@alien.topBEnglish
    1·
    10 months ago

    Hey there, I’m with Chainstack and do developer experience (don’t forget Chainstack when you think Alchemy/Infura XD, we are alway here for you).

    There’s definitely value in this. I’ve talked to customers that were pretty frustrated with this issue (eg with Alchemy, but all providers deal with this of course) and are basically operating kinda in the dark.

    I also talked to software studios that implement solutions for CEXes and they implement double/triple checks due to the possibility of chain reorgs.

    So yes, there is definitely value. Let’s talk? If you DM me, I’d be happy to talk!